NO priceline hotel cancellation or change fees
  

Franchise Surveys Emerge as New Tool of the Trade

Discerning investors who want unvarnished information about a franchise before buying often peruse blogs for franchisees’ gripes or concerns. Now, there’s another item to consult: the franchisee-satisfaction survey.

At least two firms, Franchise Research Institute and Franchise Business Review, query existing franchisees in dozens of systems on their satisfaction levels and publish the results of those polls on their Web sites. Such research – typically funded by the franchise itself – may be a telling indication of how well a franchise system is working, or whether it should be avoided. The reports can be purchased for $24.95 on Franchise Research Institute’s site but are available for free on Franchise Business Review’s if franchisors agree to post them.

Both firms survey franchisees on a confidential basis, to assure them they won’t be identified and possibly punished for expressing their true feelings. Both also seek to survey most of a system’s franchisees to verify that the opinions are representative rather than those of a few grouches.

Although the questions they ask are similar – including the crucial “would you recommend this franchise to others?” — the firms’ approaches differ. Franchise Research Institute charges the franchiser involved before undertaking the survey; Franchise Business Review collects a fee after doing the research, if the franchiser wants to see what it found.

Both firms affix stamps of approval on franchisers whose franchisees generally endorse their systems. The Franchise Research Institute awards a “world-class franchisee” seal whereas the Franchise Business Review hands out “Best of the Best” citations.

Franchise companies fund the surveys partly to use the results – if positive – to recruit new franchisees. But often, the surveys can reveals cracks in the system that’s useful information to proactive franchise managers and potential investors alike.

“Some surveys will give extremely bad news to a CEO and a company’s owners,” says Jeff Johnson, president of Franchise Research Institute in Lincoln, Neb. One common issue is a franchise system that’s rapidly growing. “That causes all kinds of concerns among franchisees,” including haphazard support from field personnel, he says. If a franchise isn’t listed on the Institute’s site, a potential franchisee should ask the franchiser whether it has been graded, and what the results were, Mr. Johnson adds.

Eric Stites, who founded Franchise Business Review and runs it out of an office in Kittery, Maine, says that occasionally a franchiser he approaches with a survey pitch will turn him down. “If they have an issue they will try to squash a survey,” he says.

While he gave out 115 awards to franchises last year, and posts some of them on his site, Mr. Stites says that 80% of the franchises operating today “are simply average or below-average business opportunities.” Fast-food restaurant and automotive-related franchises often score near the bottom in his franchise-satisfaction surveys, he adds. Even so, his site recently posted a list of 11 “top food franchises.”

“A lot of dissatisfaction in franchising comes from [franchisers] not meeting initial expectations, which are typically set during the sales process…by overly-aggressive salespeople, unfortunately,” Mr. Stites says. On the other hand, companies with the highest franchisee satisfaction scores typically “don’t oversell their systems – in many cases they undersell it — and are very selective in their recruitment process,” he says.

For their part, franchisers who get disappointing approval ratings say the surveys often guide their decision-making and can lead to better operations.

For example, when Great Harvest Bread Co. , a Dillon, Mont., bakery chain, got a significantly lower score in its Franchise Research Institute survey several years ago than it had previously, the company’s executives realized they had responded too slowly to the low-carb craze.

“We had taken the position that we sell carbohydrates for a living,” recalls company president and chief executive Mike Ferretti. “But our customers were saying, ‘We’ll go someplace else. Many of us are no longer eating what you sell.’ ” As a consequence, the chain introduced a low-carb bread that remains a popular item. “Franchisees were right about our head-in-the-sand attitude,” Mr. Ferretti says. That experience “taught us a very valuable lesson.”

 Mail this post
Grow Your Community
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Three Solid Reasons to Choose Franchising as an Entrepreneur

Have you been pondering whether franchising is a good fit for you? If you’re similar to most entrepreneurs, you’re not quite sure if your involvement with a franchise is worth the cost. While answering the question of whether or not you choose a franchise over developing and building your own concept is your decision, it’s definitely imperative for you to fully weigh the pros and cons before you decide which way is best for you.

It is true that there are fees associated with the initial startup of a franchise, but that fact by itself shouldn’t dissuade you from deciding to venture this direction. After all, there are expenses related to the startup of any type of business. You need to ask yourself what you are getting in terms of business support and marketing advantages when you choose to buy in to a franchise.

Three ‘Pros’ for Franchising

1. You Gain a Healthy Head Start with Brand Name Recognition
If you choose to start your business from the bare ground, you’re at a disadvantage in terms of name recognition from the beginning because no one will ever have heard of your brand before. While you can surely raise awareness for your company’s namesake, it takes time, energy, and money. When you open a new locale of a known franchise, you’re already ahead in the race when it comes to name recognition. A major bonus associated with franchise ownership is the simple fact that prospective and existing customers are already likely to know about your brand names and company before you even open up for business.

2. Solid Support Channels from Corporate
Being an entrepreneur can turn out rather lonely. When you’re launching a small business by yourself– or even with a few partners – you end up on your own when it comes to deciding what to do first, next, and so on. In franchising however, although you’re an independent small business owner, you have teams of people in place at the corporate offices with a duty to assist you, as well as other franchise owners in other markets. They have experience with the same issues you’re facing and can offer ideas, help, and advice. So, even though you have the autonomy of entrepreneurship, when you own a franchise you aren’t really all by yourself.

3. Smart Preparations Can Lead to Quick Success
There are a handful of ways through which opening a franchise can build a platform for success in your favor. First, the business has already experienced success elsewhere, or it wouldn’t be a franchise at this point. You already know that the concept is viable when you choose to open a franchise, because it’s already operating in another locale. The system works; it’ll be your choice whether or not it’s a workable business for your market and to make it succeed. Further, overall, franchise start-ups have a much higher success rate than other small businesses. Trust what works, what has always worked and those whose success depends on yours.

 Mail this post
Grow Your Community
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Franchising Resilience in the Credit Crunch

To get to the root of why the United States is struggling toward a jobless recovery, look no further than the franchising business.

In franchising, a company lends its trademark and business system to an owner-operator who pays royalties for the right to use them. Starbucks (SBUX), Quiznos, Jenny Craig, Ace Hardware, Maaco, Pakmail – all are franchise businesses. In the U.S. there are more than 900,000, directly employing more than 11 million people.

From 2001 to 2005, the collective payrolls at franchise operations grew by 22%, to $279 billion. But that growth rate, with its healthy spin-off of jobs, has since ground to a halt, yet another byproduct of the credit crisis that produced the recession some experts tell us is nearly over.

“The flow of credit to franchisees has essentially ceased,” said Matthew Shay, chief executive officer of the International Franchising Association. “A number of banks have either left the market completely or stopped lending to small business. Without credit for people to get started in business and then to operate a business in the short term before it becomes profitable, that makes things very difficult.”

In January, the IFA predicted a loss of 10,000 franchise businesses this year, jettisoning more than 200,000 jobs. That dire forecast was predicated on the estimate that access to credit would be down by 25%, which now may seem like wishful thinking.

“We recently updated that assessment,” Shay said last week. “We now think access to credit is down closer to 40% this year. It’s become worse. We are leaving tens of thousands of jobs on the table.”

Franchise consultant and blogger Joel Libava, aka “The Franchise King,” is in the business of “strategic matchmaking,” lining up potential franchisees with the many thousands of companies that dole them out.

“I was talking with a major Cleveland-area lender recently,” Libava said. “I asked him ‘If I sent you someone with a million dollars who was looking for a $250,000 loan for a franchise - putting up $100,000 of his own - what would you tell him?’

“He told me he’d pass,” Libava said. “He said ‘We have no interest in looking at any start-ups now. There’s too much risk.’”

Libava said he’d been hearing similar things from bankers for more than a year now, “but I’d never heard it said as strongly. It’s definitely a new trend going on this year. Banks just aren’t very interested in loaning to startups.”

Businesses with fewer than 20 employees account for 25% of all jobs, but in the 2003-2007 economic expansion, they generated 40% of the job growth, according to Mark Zandi, senior economist for Moody’s Economy.com.

“In their recent efforts to recharge the economy, policy makers have all but forgotten small business, finding it both easier and more visible to help large multinational firms,” Zandi told the New York Times this week. “Unfortunately, though, big business can’t provide the jobs needed to power the economy forward.”

PricewaterhouseCoopers prepared a study for the IFA in 2006 that concluded new franchise growth over the previous five years had generated 140,000 new businesses and 1.2 million jobs.

“Franchising now provides more jobs than many other sectors of the economy, including the durable goods manufacturing and financial activities sectors,” Shay said. “It is clear that franchising is a critical engine of economic growth in the United States powering local communities across the country.”

Many people think only of fast-food when they think of franchises. But the Franchise Association now lists more than 75 different categories to describe its members. Franchises range from advertising/direct mail to construction to dating services to home inspection to security systems to video rentals. Printing and copying centers, maid services, computer repair, lawn-care services, real estate, lodging and travel agencies. More than 400 U.S. franchise systems operate internationally. Subway alone has more than 26,000 franchises in 84 countries.

Franchising is attractive to many entrepreneurs because it offers many of the advantages of a partnership. According to an IFA brochure: “Franchising means being in business for yourself but not by yourself. Whether it’s accounting and financing, advertising and public relations, personnel management, purchasing, or inventory control, franchisors are there to provide ‘hands on,’ one-to-one assistance.”

For a potential franchisee, the start-up costs can range from $20,000 or less, to more than $1 million. Seventy percent of franchisors charge an initial fee of $40,000 or less, and the average investment, excluding real estate costs, is between $350,000 -$500,000.

But in the current environment, lining up the money is not for the faint of heart. Consider the travails of Tom Drennen as he struggled to open a Beef O’Brady neighborhood pub in Newport, Ky., last year. The franchise operator advised him to apply for a $500,000 loan with New York-based CIT (CITGQ), then the nation’s largest National Business Association lender.

“They were very strict,” he recalled this week. “I had to put 15% down, I had to get an architect signed up, I got general contractor bids and acquired a lease that I had to personally guarantee.”

By October 2008, Drennen said all of CIT’s loan requirements had been met, and the loan was set to close in two weeks.

“Then CIT called me and said ‘We’re freezing all our loans, we can’t lend you the money,’” he said. “I asked about all the commitments I had lined up, and they said there was nothing they could do.”

Because he already had signed the lease to get the CIT loan, Drennen began paying $5,000 monthly rent on an empty building.

“I hit the streets,” he recalled. “I hit up every single bank in northern Kentucky and southern Ohio, from nationally known to community banks. They were all so scared. They didn’t want to do any startups, and told me restaurants were especially risky. At least 30 banks turned us down. I tried to find creative ways to get out there, finally reaching real deep into my pockets.”

After reading about the federal stimulus money being funneled to banks, Drennen made a second round of all the lenders, this time putting up 60% of the money himself.

“They still kicked me out” he said. “They wanted nothing to do with a startup. It was really confusing, I felt like I was misled. I thought the stimulus money was put there to get back out to the public.”

Finally, Huntington Bancshares (HBAN), a regional lender out of Columbus, Ohio, agreed to lend him $100,000. Through his research, Drennen found out about an economic development district that had been formed in Newport in the 1970s after a flood.

“It was a revolving fund that was still operating” Drennen said. “They got with the bank and both went in for 20%.”

After paying nine months’ lease on the vacant property, Drennen opened July 27.

“We’re doing excellent - me and the 40 employees I hired,” he said.

Tom Drennen at his storeHis advice: “Be resilient. If you are someone who gives up, this isn’t for you. You’re gonna be turned down many times, but realize they are giving you constructive criticism all the time that you can use with the next bank. Each turndown made me that much more determined to prove them wrong.”

 Mail this post
Grow Your Community
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Current State of the Domestic Franchising Market






Feature Story:
The State of
the Current Domestic Franchise Market

IFG Home
|
About Us
|
Request Info
| Press Room
| Contact Us |
Our Clients

Grow Your
Franchise Abroad Without Debt & Why You Should Act Now
SBA Report:
October 30, 2009
 


The recession has hit franchise owners particularly hard, with the Small
Business Administration (SBA) reporting record loan default rates for 2008-2009.
According to the SBA, individuals who took on SBA loans to finance a franchise
had a 43% higher failure rate than in 2007.

 


In total, those franchise losses cost the SBA $93.3 million last year -
nearly 170% higher
than the year before.

 


Since 2004, franchise loan defaults have increased by nearly 10% (from 3.1% to
13.4%), highlighting that franchise owners have had an increasingly difficult
time making a successful go of their new ventures.

 


As international franchising consultants, we at IFG approach this issue with a
“Learn from the mistakes of others” point of view.  While it is undoubtedly
disturbing to see these statistics; and while it may seem that these numbers
indicate franchising to be a risky endeavor, it is imperative to remember a few
key factors:


  1. These franchises represent a minority in the worldwide market


  2. These concepts created debt at the outset, starting out in the red


  3. We can learn a valuable lesson from their failures without risk to ourselves


  4. Franchising as a business model is superbly secure and expansion-friendly


Our focus is solely international in scope, meaning franchise expansions in
which we are involved do not rely on any sort of lending, credit or debt. 
It is simply not a viable or economical practice for the international
franchising markets we serve.  

 


Because international franchise expansion abroad does not involve debt or
outside lending practices, we enjoy the peace of mind that some of the
following list of franchises might not.

 

These brands had the highest SBA loan failure rates in the United States in
2008.

 

    
1. Noble Roman's Pizza

 


Billing itself as "The Better Pizza People," this Indianapolis-based
franchiser has had a tough time selling that proposition to customers. While
the company reported a 30% net income increase in Q1 of 2009, Q2 total
revenues were down
more than $500,000 from the comparable period in 2008. Maybe that's why 53%
of all owners with SBA loans defaulted in 2008.
 


 

     
2. PJ's Coffee and Tea Café


PJ's Coffee and Tea Café started out as a small business in New Orleans 30
years ago and only recently began selling franchise rights across the south,
southeast and southwest. It might want to stick to Cajun country - 50% of
the franchisees failed on their SBA loans last year.

 


 

     
3

Super Suppers


At the height of the market, working families expanded their spending to
include luxuries such as cleaning services, lawn services and even
assemble-your-own dinner services.
 

Super Suppers jumped on the concept and its franchise growth was exponential
between 2005 (40)to 2006 (152), and 2007 (206). However, the growth stalled
with no new franchise owners coming on board in 2008, and existing owners
with SBA loans began failing at a quick pace - 42%, to be exact, in 2008.

 


 


4. Figaro's Italian Pizza


Figaro's has been in business for 28 years, but most of its franchise owners
aren't likely to reach that same anniversary. One-third defaulted on their
loans, unable to grab enough of the industry's $32 billion in annual revenues.


 


5. New York NY Fresh Deli


Perhaps it was the low single-site franchise fee ($17,500) that attracted new
business owners, but it was low revenues that led to closed doors. Thirty-one
per cent defaulted on SBA loans in '08


 


6. Amazon Cafe


This franchiser offers smoothies, wraps, salads, soups, juices and more, but
apparently not enough more to keep all operators in business. Thirty per cent
failed in 2008, and more than 52% have defaulted on their SBA loans since 2000.


 


 


7. Simple Simon's Pizza


Simple Simon's grew from one store in Tulsa to a network of 220 restaurants
nationwide since 1982. However, nearly 30% of store owners who took on an SBA
loan to finance the start-up have defaulted. Perhaps selling pizza isn't quite
so simple after all.


 


 


8. Snip-Its


The Snip-Its children's hair salons ranked 30th on the Franchise Times' 2007
list of 55 fastest growing franchises, but two years later that growth has
stalled. Thirty per cent of store owners with SBA financing failed to repay
their loans in 2008.


 


9. U Build It


Seeking to grab a share of the market that made Lowe's and Home Depot household
names the U Build It franchise offers owners an opportunity to serve as
"construction consultants" for DIYers interested in building or renovating their
own homes. But when the housing market collapsed, it shouldn't come as a shock
that 27% of their franchisees reneged on their SBA loans.


 


10. Bellacino's Pizza


If you're a Facebook user, you can become a Bellacino's Pizza "fan."
Unfortunately 26% of Bellacino's owners that took on SBA financing couldn't get
enough regular fans to stay current on their debt payments. That number closes
in on 30% dating back to 2000.


 


11. Blockbuster Video


While Blockbuster was able to fend off brick and mortar competitors, it has
struggled to maintain market share since Netflix and Redbox changed the rules of
the game. In 2008, one in four store owners with SBA loans failed to repay their
debt; that number jumps to a sobering 38% since 2000.


 


12. Pizza Factory


If this list proves anything, it should be that entrepreneurs might do well to
avoid pizza franchises. Twenty-four per cent of Pizza Factory owners took a pass
on repaying their SBA loans in 2008, and that number jumps to 43% if you look
back to 2000.


 


 


13. Pro Golf


With a rising unemployment rate, workers aren't knocking off early to hit
the links.

Perhaps that's what led to 24% of Pro Golf franchise owners defaulting on
their SBA loans. But the fact that 64% of all owners have failed to repay
their loans since 2000 makes you think that perhaps the business model is
the real news, not the recession.


 


14. Conoco Service Station


While ConocoPhillips Company is a Fortune 500 company, its service center
franchise owners (more than 3,100 operate under the Conoco, Phillips 66 and
Union 76 brands) are struggling. More than one in five (22%) have defaulted on
their SBA financing commitment.


 


15. Keva Juice


Keva's product isn't a "blendsation" everywhere. Twenty-two percent of these
smoothie store owners didn't raise enough revenue to repay their SBA loans last
year; more than one in four (26%) have defaulted on their loans since 2000.

There you have it. So what is the moral
of this story? Most foreign master franchisees do not use debt AT ALL. Glean a
lesson from the experiences of other entrepreneurs and pursue expansion avenues
abroad while the domestic U.S. market recovers.

Good business practices have good
reasons behind them.  Likewise for the bad ones.
 
To learn more about franchising
internationally and avoiding the costly repercussions of debt,
click here
.


 Mail this post
Grow Your Community
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Italian Investment Group ‘Beefs Up’ Franchise Industry in Russia





 
 
Feature Story:
Cremonini Group Eyes Big Profits While Boosting Russian Franchise Market

IFG Home

| About Us |
Request Info
| Press Room
| Contact Us |
Our Clients

How One Italian Investor is
'Beefing Up' The Russian Food Franchise Industry
 


<< Luigi Cremonini

 

The Big Mac that
you pick up at a local McDonald’s restaurant might soon contain meat from an
Orenburg cow processed by an Italian plant in the Moscow region.

It’s all part of Italian businessman Luigi Cremonini’s strategy
to tap into Russia’s “huge potential” by making “huge investments.”

Italy’s Cremonini Group will open a new meat-processing plant in
the Moscow region to produce hamburgers for McDonald’s by year-end as it moves
to build a full production chain in Russia, Cremonini told The Moscow Times.

The founder of the Italian giant, one of the largest food
companies in Europe, is not at all dismayed that the plant will cost twice as
much as expected or that Russia’s cattle population is steadily declining.

“We strongly believe in the prospects of doing business in
Russia, and this is why we decided to make a strong direct investment, 100
million euros [$148 million], to build the meat-processing plant in Odintsovo,”
he said in an interview Wednesday.

“We are already a supplier of beef for McDonald’s restaurants
across Europe and will now make hamburgers for the Russian branch of the
international fast-food chain,” he said.

The Odintsovo plant, which will occupy 25,000 square meters,
will initially produce 25,000 tons of meat products per year and increase in
capacity to 50,000 tons in a few years, he said. Work on the plant started in
2007.

The plant will be operated by Cremonini’s local subsidiary,
Marrusia.

McDonald’s,
which is rapidly expanding worldwide and plans to open 30 new restaurants in
Russia this year, has processed its own food needs but said it needed Cremonini
to keep up with growing demand.

“Due to an extensive McDonald’s expansion in Russia, the
decision was made to outsource the production facilities of ZAO
Moscow-McDonald’s Food Processing Complex,” McDonald’s said in an e-mailed
statement Thursday.

“Marrusia … will ensure production, storage and delivery of meat
products for McDonald’s restaurants,” it said. “Supplies are planned to begin
with the opening of the partner’s facility.”

The plant will provide 10,000 tons of meat to McDonald’s next
year.

Cremonini said he saw the plant as a strategic investment and
was cautious in predicting when it might break even.

“In normal conditions, you would expect to justify your expenses
for a project like this in 10 years, but Russia is a country where it is kind of
difficult to make this kind of precise calculation,” he said.

Cremonini stressed, however, that only major investments work in
Russia and said his company has invested more here than in any other country
outside Italy.

“This is a country with great perspectives, so the logic behind
this is simple: huge potential, huge investments,” he said. “At the beginning,
we of course made a business plan outlining a lot of unpredictable factors, so
we are quite aware of what we got ourselves into.”

Cremonini Group was founded by Cremonini in 1963 and entered the
Soviet market in 1985, supplying meat to the state-owned trade concern
Prodintorg. The company started to target Russian consumers in the late 1980s
and set up Marrusia in 1998. In 2008, the company reported turnover of 133
million euros in Russia, up 5 percent from the previous year. The group’s total
consolidated revenues were 2.2 billion euros, an increase of 6.6 percent.

The new Odintsovo plant will become the final stage of a
full-cycle production chain that the company intends to build over the next few
years, starting with several small slaughterhouses in the Orenburg region.

“Our strong conviction is that if you want to succeed in this
country, you have to produce and to process here. You cannot consider Russia
just as an export market,” Cremonini said.

The businessman would not disclose exact investment figures for
the Orenburg region, saying only that the amount would not be as big as in
Odintsovo.

“Judging by the experience of our Odintsovo project, we prefer
not to disclose figures,” he said. “Initially we planned to invest 45 million to
50 million euros in the Odintsovo project, but the final cost doubled.”

The major challenge during the construction of the plant in
Odintsovo was meeting all official rules and regulations, he said.

“It was an incredible adventure to both meet the timing of the
construction and respect all the formalities,” he said. “In Europe, we sometimes
think that we have the highest construction, hygienic and other standards, but
this is not true. In Russia you have to multiply everything by two.”

The reason the company plans to build several small
slaughterhouses instead of one big enterprise is the relatively low density of
the cattle population in Russia.

“In Italy, we have two big slaughterhouses that each process
1,000 cattle per day,” Cremonini said. “In Russia, it’s better to have
several smaller plants in different areas of the country where the cattle
population is concentrated.”
 

He said his company’s principle was to build slaughterhouses no
farther than 500 kilometers from cattle farms in the interest of the humane
treatment of live cattle during shipping. He said he had calculated all the
possible risks of shipping meat from Orenburg to the Moscow region.

“If the trucks can cover the distance from the slaughterhouse to
the plant in two days, there is no problem for us,” he said.

The distance between Orenburg and Moscow is roughly 1,500
kilometers.

Cremonini would not speculate about the possible costs of
highway bribery, a common phenomenon in Russia that poses a serious obstacle for
quick transportation and increases costs.

“Regarding highway bribery, we have never faced this kind of
problem,” he said. “Anyway, if there are some difficulties in this country, they
are absolutely the same in all the other countries of the world.”

During the last decade, meat production has dropped by 55
percent, according to statistics from the Agriculture Ministry. But Cremonini
said “meat” was too general a term, and pork and poultry should be separated
from beef, which requires a more complicated production process.

“Poultry and pork production is now doing pretty well, while
beef production is decreasing,” he said. “In order to organize pork and poultry
production, all you basically need is cereal to transfer fodder into animal
protein — and Russia is rich with cereals — while beef production is more
complicated.”

In January, there were 20.7 million head of cattle in Russia,
down 2 percent from the same month in 2008, according to the State Statistics
Service.

In order to efficiently produce cattle and beef, you have to
“produce” cattle farmers, Cremonini said.

“And this is the problem in Russia — you need people to produce
cattle, and finding such people and stimulating them to grow cattle takes a very
long time,” he said.

“This industry has been destroyed in the last 20 years,” he
said. “It is a very slow and long-term process to rebuild the cattle
population.”


 Mail this post
Grow Your Community
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

RUSSIA’S VLADIMIR PUTIN EXTENDS WARM WELCOME TO FOREIGN INVESTORS

RUSSIA’S VLADIMIR PUTIN EXTENDS WARM WELCOME TO FOREIGN INVESTORS

Understanding The Invitation From Putin and Why You Should Respond


Russia’s prime minister, Vladimir V. Putin, whose government took control of several oil companies when he served as president, gave a speech Tuesday saying the state must now step back from the economy and let private enterprise take the lead in pulling Russia out of recession.

The speech, at a banking forum in Moscow on September 30, 2009, echoed recent assurances by his ministers and economic advisors that Russia is becoming more attentive to the concerns of investors. Mr. Putin also reiterated their suggestions that a new round of privatizations could be in the cards for Russia, The New York Times’s Andrew E. Kramer writes from Moscow. 

The speech on economic policy was noteworthy for its exceptionally warm endorsement of a role for private investors. That had not been the case in recent years.

 

“We understand how deceptive blind faith in an omnipotent state is, how illusory are the hopes that total intervention in economic life might fix everything and put everything in its place,” Mr. Putin said.

He went on to praise private enterprise. “To the extent that the situation stabilizes, that the effects of the crisis are overcome, we plan to consistently and purposefully reduce state intervention in the economy,” he said, adding that a new round of privatizations could follow.

 

The government already has been extending an olive branch to the petroleum industry, offering new investments and a greater role in a sector at a meeting with oil company executives last week.

Mr. Putin noted that, while the government inevitably took stakes in Russian companies during the crisis, it did not use the downturn to impose greater controls and did not restrict the free conversion of the ruble.

 

“We will continue the line of encouraging private initiative, integration into the global economy and the creation of a favorable investment climate,” he said.

In his first term as president, from 2000 until 2004, Mr. Putin had introduced a number of pro-business reforms such as a flat tax and a streamlined system for registering small enterprises, but followed this in his second term with a sweeping extension of state control over the natural resources companies during the boom.

 

On Tuesday, Mr. Putin took a different line. Russia may eventually liberalize even the trade in natural gas, though a monopoly would remain with Gazprom for exports for at least the medium term, he said.

 

During the oil boom, export revenues exploded and foreign investors rushed to pile on to the economic expansion. If anything, the government struggled with the problem of too much money, sparking inflation and making local products uncompetitive with imported goods.

That reversed last autumn, and Russia is now again in a position of having to compete for limited investor money with other emerging economies.

“Now, with capital around the world much more scarce, there’s a recognition that Russia does have to play the game,” Rory MacFarquhar, an economist at Goldman Sachs’ office in Moscow, told The Times in a telephone interview. “It does have to make overtures to foreign investors and it cannot take them for granted.”

In one sign of some stabilization in the Russian economy, the Central Bank on Tuesday lowered its refinancing rate for the second time in two weeks, indicating it is less worried now about a run on the ruble and can instead focus on trying to stimulate lending to businesses. 

Click Here to Expand Your Brand Across the Globe

 Mail this post
Grow Your Community
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Repercussions of the Financial Crisis and Some Effects on the Current Trends of Franchising in Areas of Eastern Europe…

A rather difficult economic situation in most countries of the world has affected all aspects of business including the franchising industry. Therefore, it is time to study the ongoing changes in the economy and, particularly, in franchising in Russia.   

Most sectors of the Russian economy has seen a significant business slowdown caused by an abrupt drop in demand for almost all kinds of goods and services, by a reduced scope of financing opportunities and available loans and, as a result, by numerous payment failures. All spheres of business, including franchising businesses, have to react to it in different ways.

The first and most wide-spread reaction to economic difficulties is to cut down on expenses and to start to economize on everything. At present it is vividly illustrated by mass lay-offs and payroll reductions. In the retail industry it can also be seen in the reducing number (or complete abolition) of free services, e.g. free plastic bags in supermarkets. The ultimate stage of this kind of measures is a partially or completely frozen business. It happens either in the form of shorter working hours or of an indefinite period of total inactivity. From the buyers’ point of view, to cut down on expenses and to save on everything one can save on means fewer purchases and less expensive counterparts of usual goods. At the same time certain companies – with a few franchising concepts among them – have managed to take advantage of the economic crunch. For instance, many QSR’s have increased their sales volume due to the fact that new clients have turned to fast food restaurants from higher priced cafes.     

 

The second type of reaction reflects changes in corporate policies that aim at stimulating the demand. This kind of measures includes various discounts and promotion activities. Franchising stores are lavishly decorated with bright posters announcing unbelievable discounts – sometimes 50% or even 70%. It is mostly seen in the garment and footwear retail chains. The second type of reaction to the economic hardships also covers certain attempts to help buyers with financing a purchase. For example, one of the largest Russian car factories – Gaz – offers its buyers to pay a portion of the interest rate in case a bank loan is involved in the purchase of a car. The regional government of Nizhniy Novgorod (where the factory is situated) also tries to incite people to buy Gaz cars. The official offer is 50,000 rubles (about 1,640 USD) to everyone who decides to exchange their old car to a new one from the Gaz plant.

 

Most far-sighted entrepreneurs and top managers choose the third type of reaction – to critically study the range of their goods and/or services in order to change it in accordance with the current situation. The same car factory – Gaz, for instance, has announced a soon to appear new variation of their popular model with a much cheaper engine. Retailers and wholesale companies have also started to offer “anticrisis” versions of their goods and services.

The forth way to react to the difficulties of the world economy is less widely spread and includes attempts to improve and optimize marketing and sales techniques. However, more and more entrepreneurs turn to analyzing the efficiency of advertizing and opt for cost-effective partisan marketing instead of more conventional means of advertizing. 

Franchising concepts in Russia start to change as well against the background of the above mentioned changes in different spheres of business. The general drop in demand for all kinds of goods and services has affected the potential buyers of franchises, i.e. the investors. Some time ago buying a franchise was considered as one of the safest ways of capital investment but now the situation has changed. The profitability of many franchising concepts reduces. Potential investors understand it and show less interest in buying franchises. The number of investors in the retail sector has significantly decreased. Unfortunately, some Russian franchising concepts have already faced forced closings of their franchisees. Although none of the Russian franchisors have shut down so far, there are already a couple of cases of totally frozen businesses.    

Speaking about the garment and footwear retail chains it is worth mentioning that the worst situation is seen in the mid-priced segment. Clients can be now divided in two basic groups: those who don’t feel any difference because of the world economic crunch and are used to buying whatever they like constitute the first group and tend to buy expensive goods; and the rest of us who have to be more careful with their spendings fall into the second group and buy predominantly cheap goods. There is less and less demand for mid-priced goods. Thus retail stores of this price segment are forced to shut down. It can easily be seen by a growing number of free spaces in shopping centers. Therefore, the drop in demand also affected the development and introduction to the market of new franchising concepts in Russia, especially in the retail sector.    

 

Nevertheless, potential investors who are willing to invest their money in a new business with the help of a franchising model can still be found in Russia. First of all, they are the people who try to secure their capital against inflation and vague economic perspectives.

 

The economic crunch revealed the most stable businesses. These are the companies that increased their sales volume instead of reducing all activity. And sometimes it happens not “instead of” the crisis but “thanks to” it! The majority of these businesses fall into the production and service spheres which can be regarded as a positive trend (taking into consideration the fact that there are not so many production franchises either in Russia or in Western countries). Investors are more willing to start a new business in the sphere of production or services than in the retail sector as in the longer term this type of investment is considered more secure. The investors’ interest to the above mentioned spheres is also influenced by the following factors:  

1. Many qualified specialists have been laid off in these spheres and are now eager to work, even for a lesser salary.  
2. A growing amount of unoccupied commercial real estate gives a chance to find an appropriate property with a lesser rent.  
3. Buying a franchise helps to start a new business in a short period of time and thus to diversify the existing business assets reducing commercial risks.
4. And the most important factor – any franchising concept must have reliable proof of its success. If the business overcomes the economic hardships and moreover introduces a new franchising concept to the market, it is worth studying this business offer. “Crisisproof business” may become a new quality mark for a franchise.   

 Mail this post
Grow Your Community
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Payless Shoes Brand Strolling Into Russia

Payless Steps into the Russian Market  

One of largest footwear discounters promises to open 150 stores in Russia.

An American footwear company Collective Brands Inc. (footwear stores Payless and The Stride Rite) has announced the oncoming opening of Payless stores in Russia. The chain of inexpensive designer footwear stores Payless was established in 1956 in Kansas, the USA. According to Hoover’s, last financial year Collective Brands’ sales amounted to $3.442 billion (with 4.5 thousand outlets in more than 10 countries of the world).

A co-owner of Alba footwear stores Alexander Bayer says that Payless is a classic example of a footwear discounter. “They are our direct competitors”, - admits Sergey Lomakin, a co-owner of another footwear chain in Russia - CentrObuv. The main part of Payless assortment is footwear, but the stores also sell clothes and accessories. An average price for a pair of shoes is $30-40. The most expensive ones are sold for $49.99, as Payless official web site has it. Taking into ac count the customs expenditures the same footwear in Russian stores can turn out to be 25-30% more expensive, believes Alexander Bayer. This price range is comparable to that of CentrObuv stores where a pair of shoes costs $30-70, according to the company’s on-line catalogue. 

A holding from Kuwait - The Alshaya Group - now possesses the exclusive rights to franchise the Payless brand in the Russian market. The first stores are expected to open their doors at the beginning of 2010. According to Collective Brands’ CEO Matthew Rubel, by 2015 the company plans to increase the number of stores up to 150 outlets. The Russian stores will be managed and operated by The Alshaya Group, while Collective Brands Inc. will have an option to purchase the whole chain in future.

The Alshaya Group runs business in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Cyprus, Egypt, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Russia. In Russia it already develops a number of Western franchise concepts such as The Body Shop, Mothercare, Next, Claire’s and others. According to the company’s web site, it has more than 80 stores in different Russian cities. Furthermore, the holding develops the Starbucks chain in Russia. The first Starbucks coffee shop opened in Moscow in September, 2007. The second one followed in December, 2007. Now there are already 19 locations in the Russian capital where one can chat over a mug of coffee in a globally known atmosphere of a Starbucks café. And obviously the chain will grow further beyond the borders of the capital city.

Although the Moscow office of The Alshaya Group doesn’t comment on their new franchise and the details of the agreement with Collective Brands Inc., it’s evident that foreign franchisors from quite different spheres trust the Kuwaiti holding, and not without reasonable ground.

 Mail this post
Grow Your Community
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Specialty Coffee House Franchise Announces Expansion Into Russia

August 28, 2009 - Specialty Cafe franchise Colombiano Coffee House is pleased to announce today its affiliation with International Franchising Group, LLC to expand its concept all over the world.  Having garnered great success with its unique, high-quality coffee and confections, the Colombiano Coffee House brand seeks to establish a new franchise network overseas. 

Colombiano Coffee House’s rich history & concept is inspired by a mythical love story taking place as far as 1923, with the opening of “Coco’s Coffee shop” in Costa Rica. Colombiano Coffee House is not your conventional corner Bistro/Café. With its terrific food and drink menu, it is the spice of Latin Taste, combined with the excitement of Latin Life, for a completely enjoyable and satisfying experience in a chic, comfortable environment. Colombiano Coffee House is thrilled to have IFG representing them in Russia and other parts of the world. “We personally believe that IFG is extremely well-experienced in Russia,” says Colombiano Coffee House’s Director of Development, “and the probability of obtaining serious contacts which will lead to signed Franchises is much higher with IFG than with others.”

Currently operating in Lebanon, Qatar and Abu Dhabi, Colombiano Coffee House understands that, when it comes to Food & Beverages, including Coffee, people all over the world want quality.  O. Victor Lattanzi, CEO of International Franchising Group, LLC notes, “The Colombiano Coffee House concept is terrific, not just for the customers, but for the owner-operators as well. They are going to love the concept, the coffee, the smoothies, the food and the culture.”

 Mail this post
Grow Your Community
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Brinker Announces Plans to Open 25 Chili’s Restaurants in Russia

Restaurant company Brinker International inks franchise deal to expand into Russia.

Brinker International, Inc. has entered into a development agreement to bring their popular Chili’s Grill & Bar concept to Russia. The first Chili’s will open in November 2010 in Moscow, with 25 total restaurants planned for expansion in the Russian Federation per the terms of the agreement.

John Reale, president of global business development for Brinker International said, “Russia offers vast potential for the Chili’s brand, and we look forward to sharing our unique bold flavors and dining experience with guests throughout the country.”

Brinker International currently owns, operates or franchises 203 international locations in 29 countries and two territories outside the United States. As part of the company’s goal to become the globally dominant casual dining portfolio company, Brinker International plans to have 500 restaurants open outside the United States by 2014.

Learn More About Franchising Internationally >>>

 Mail this post
Grow Your Community
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,